Weather Forecast

SmartBargains.com

Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC

Letters to the Editor Archive

See Letters to the Editor page for links to other letters or hit your "back" button to go to your previous page.

 

 

 

 Letters Published in December 5, 2007 Issue

 

 

 December 5, 2007 - Letter Submitted by John Leisure, Knightstown

When anyone complains about the "Patriot" Act and its potential for government abuse, or whenever there are complaints about the National Security Administration eavesdropping on the private communications of U.S. citizens and residents, my conservative friends say, "If you have nothing to hide, then why would you object?" OK, OK, I don't really have any conservative friends (they all got mad at me when I poked holes in their arguments with facts), but you do hear this repeated over and over.

This attitude got me thinking about the Charles A. Beard Memorial School Corporation and its decision not to allow Kevin Knott, an elected school board member, see certain school corporation records in their uncensored form. Although the Indiana Public Access Counselor said she doesn't think Knott or other school board members should be prevented from reviewing the records, CAB has still not made them available. It seems that the only CAB information that Knott and we, the taxpayers who support this school system, are entitled to is heavily redacted pages that would make the Bush White House, the NSA and the CIA envious. I wonder just what they are hiding? What is going on when the school administration thinks that it is prudent to thumb their collective noses at a duly elected official who, as our representative, is ultimately their boss? What sort of nefarious deeds are going on there anyway?

I'd sure like to see a little more sunshine illuminating what's going on at CAB, but that, of course, won't happen as long as voters keep voting for the status quo. Perhaps it is time for the citizens of Knightstown and the surrounding area to think about this before marking their next school board ballot for "more of the same." I can't think of a single reason for allowing people to spend my money and then tell me that I don't need to know whose pocket it is going into.

RETURN TO TOP    

 

 December 5, 2007 - Letter Submitted by Adrian W. Darling, Knightstown

On November 10, as a liaison between law enforcement and the community, I spoke during the Crime Stoppers meeting. While speaking, I made some comments that I would like to publicly apologize for.

The point I was trying to make was that some drug users are unemployed. These individuals support their habit by stealing from good people. Drug use and theft often go hand-in-hand. In no way did I mean that all construction workers are drug users. In fact, I have many friends that not only work in construction, but are good, honest, hardworking people that even own their own construction company.

The community needs to be aware that as long as drug use continues and rises, so too do other crimes such as theft. Again, as I did during the crime stoppers meeting after my comments were made, I, as well as Chief Baker, would like to apologize if my comments offended anyone. I have lived (and worked) in this community for many years. The police department has done and will continue to do a fine job fighting the drug problem in this community.

RETURN TO TOP    

 

 December 5, 2007 - Letter Submitted by Rex Bell, Hagerstown

One of my favorite pastimes in my younger days was devising new ways to irritate my little sisters. At one point, my old buddy Stinky Wilmont and I discovered that simply peering at one of them over the back of a school bus seat was enough to set them off. We, of course, were delighted, until one Sunday morning when we were taking the family station wagon to church. I summoned my best staring technique, and proceeded to look at two of my sisters at the same time. I fully expected a swat from the front seat when they screamed in unison, "Mom! He's looking at us!" Instead, our mother calmly replied, "Well, just ignore him."

I was crushed that our diabolical plan to drive my sisters stark raving mad could be so easily neutralized, and I worried what effect "just ignoring me" would have on my other methods of aggravation. It turned out to be an effective deterrent against most of our audio and visual taunts, and Stinky and I eventually reverted to catching crawdads as an alternate form of entertainment.

That little piece of advice worked out pretty well for my sisters then, and it has served me quite well since. I also think it would come in handy out at the statehouse right about now. The ACLU is involved in another lawsuit seeking a court order to prevent anybody from opening a legislative session with a prayer. Now, I understand that there are people, both religious and secular, who are opposed to intermixing government and religion - and if anybody attempts to force an unwilling person to pray, we should all join with the ACLU and ask the courts to stop it. But it seems we have become dependent on the courts and the government to shield us from everything that might offend us, and we're talking about something here that doesn't require a court order or government intervention of any kind. If a person doesn't want to participate or listen to a prayer, simply use the time to organize your own thoughts, or get a cup of coffee, or reflect on some lesson you learned from your mother early in life.

I'm not sure when we developed such thin skin. High schools and colleges have changed the names of their team mascots for fear they might offend certain groups of people, usually Native Americans. (Fortunately for my alma mater, the animal kingdom is not so touchy about these things.) And if my old buddy Stinky was still in school today, I just imagine he would be subjected to some sort of counseling to help him deal with the possible trauma of having such a nickname.

Americans aren't the only people that could stand a little toughening up. Recently, a teacher in Sudan was sentenced to 15 days in jail for allowing her students to name a teddy bear after a religious leader. And in Australia, Santa has been instructed not to say "Ho, ho, ho!" on the chance that certain professional ladies might take offense.

Now, just so you know, the holiday season is approaching, and if I meet you on the street, I might wish you a Merry Christmas. If that offends you, feel free to ignore me. If it REALLY offends you, and you feel the necessity to chastise me for making such a comment, or if you feel the need to make some unsavory gesture in my direction, that's all right too. I'll probably just ignore it.

And just in case I don't see you in the next couple of weeks, Merry Christmas. Ho, ho, ho.

 

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR MAIN PAGE                                                                                          RETURN TO TOP